If you are facing murder, homicide, or manslaughter charges, contact Attorney Nellie L. King immediately. Murder or homicide charges hold severe and drastic consequences if you are found guilty. Attorney King uses a personalized approach with each of her clients to build a strong and tenacious defense strategy. As a former public defender, she will work one-on-one with her clients to frame a just defense around their circumstances in a way that is truthful, fair, and, most importantly, creates empathy around her client’s situation.
To better understand the circumstances of your case and potential penalties, note the different types of murder charges:
This type of charge refers to the unlawful killing of a human being when perpetrated from a premeditated design to cause death to another human being. First degree murder is punishable by life in prison without parole or the death penalty.
The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by an act imminently dangerous to another and showing a depraved mind without regard to human life, although without any premeditated intent to cause another’s death, is considered second degree murder. A person can be convicted of second-degree murder even if they did not specifically intend to kill anyone. Second degree murder is considered a felony of the first degree and is punishable by up to life in prison.
This type of murder refers to the unlawful killing of a human being when perpetrated without any design to effect death by a person engaged in the perpetration of, or in the attempt to perpetrate, any felony other than those under felony murder.
This occurs when a person is driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle and has a blood alcohol level of over 0.08, or is under the influence of alcohol to the extent that their normal faculties are impaired, and, as a result, causes the death of another person. DUI manslaughter is a second-degree felony punishable by a maximum of 15 years in the Florida Department of Corrections.
There are instances when an individual might be charged with first degree murder even if they had no intent to kill the victim. If a death occurs during the commission of a dangerous felony, prosecutors may seek a conviction based on the Felony Murder Doctrine. The Felony Murder Rule allows prosecutors to charge someone with first degree murder when the death of a non-participant in the offense occurs during the commission, attempt to commit, or escape from the commission of various enumerated felonies.
Some examples of such felonies include:
Participants in the underlying offense are deemed responsible under the law if a homicide occurs during the commission of the underlying crime. The state does not have to prove that the defendant intended for death to result from their actions. In fact, the death can even be accidental and still be considered a felony murder.
Defending a felony murder charge could involve defending the felony in question that the state claims the accused was participating in when the death occurred. Another defense could be the Independent Act Doctrine.
The draconian aspects of the Felony Murder Rule are obvious – to hold a person accountable for the actions of another, without any correlation between the varying levels of the parties’ involvement, or level of intent, flies in the face of the age-old principle of mens rea, or “guilty mind.” The potential punishments for a conviction based under a felony murder theory are the same as for first degree premeditated murder – life in prison without parole or the death penalty.
Manslaughter is the killing of a human being by the act, procurement, or culpable negligence of another, without lawful justification. Manslaughter allegations lack the element of premeditation associated with other murder charges.
The killing of a human being, or the killing of a viable fetus by any injury to the mother, caused by the operation of a motor vehicle by another in a reckless manner likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another is considered vehicular homicide. This is a second-degree felony punishable by a maximum of 15 years in the Florida Department of Corrections.
When you are accused of homicide, it can feel like the weight of the world is on your shoulders. If you are convicted, you could face significant prison time or even the death penalty. That is why you must have an experienced and knowledgeable West Palm Beach homicide attorney on your side, fighting to demonstrate how the charges against you are not accurate or working to get them reduced.
The best defense strategy is dependent on the circumstances of your case, but some of the options that may be available to you include:
The best defense against homicide charges will vary depending on the circumstances of your case. However, there are some general things that can make any homicide defense stronger:
Florida typically assigns experienced law enforcement officers and prosecutors to investigate and litigate homicide and manslaughter cases. Law enforcement typically utilizes advanced technology and complex scientific methodology when conducting these investigations and prosecutions. As a result, it is critical to retain an experienced, aggressive, and reputable homicide criminal defense lawyer to build your defense.
Attorney Nellie L. King may employ numerous strategies to defend against a charge of homicide, murder, or manslaughter. For instance, homicide or murder may be justified if the offense was committed out of self-defense. Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law may be applicable to the circumstances around your case, and, if successful, your charge might be dismissed by the court after a Stand Your Ground hearing. If the use of force is considered justifiable under the Stand Your Ground Law, you could also be considered immune from civil liability.
In some instances, homicides and murders may also be considered excusable. An example could be if the defendant is an actual and continuous victim of repeated domestic violence and consequently killed their spouse out of a perceived threat of real and serious danger. This is known as Battered Spouse Syndrome, and it is a viable defense recognized in Florida. Another form of excusable homicide exists when the suspect is legally insane.
A finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGI) may be substantiated when the defendant suffers from a mental infirmity, disease, or defect and, because of this condition, the defendant either:
Did not know what they were doing or the consequences of their actions; or
Knew what they were doing and its consequences but did not know that it was wrong.
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity represents an affirmative defense and the defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence. Attorney Nellie L. King has significant experience with this defense strategy, as she has litigated convincing cases where her clients were deemed Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, including murder cases where the client was committed to a Florida Hospital instead of a Florida Prison.
Additionally, misidentification can also serve as an important defense against homicide charges. Misidentification of the defendant is far more common than most people realize. Studies have reported that the least reliable type of evidence is eyewitness identification. It can be critical to fully evaluate, investigate, and question the validity and strength of any witness, especially that of an eyewitness, with regard to factors that can taint the identification procedure. Throughout her career, Attorney King has challenged law enforcement protocols that taint the process of witness identification endeavors. Such identification protocols that do not live up to industry best practices should be exposed and denounced both judicially and legislatively. If the goal is for law enforcement to simply clear cases by arrest instead of solving the crime by arresting the actual perpetrator, then Florida is winning in this regard. However, as a former public defender passionate about her clients’ constitutional rights, Attorney King does not accept this behavior and continues to advocate for identification reforms in the way of proper law enforcement techniques, the use of experts, public education on the matter, and requests for adequate jury instructions in trial.
On this note, forensic, or scientific, evidence has become essential to both the prosecution and defense of homicide cases. The “CSI Effect” has created a situation where jurors expect the state to produce a certain amount of forensic evidence before juries are willing to convict someone.
Some examples of the areas in which a skilled defense attorney may be called upon to address and utilize such kinds of evidence in the defense of a homicide case include:
Attorney Nellie King has litigated forensic issues throughout her career and engages top field experts to ensure that the jury understands the real science behind the state’s claims, as well as the theory of defense. Oftentimes, the state presents junk science to jurors to bolster the state’s theory of guilt. Without counsel and the right experts to challenge the methodologies employed by the state, defendants are at a distinct disadvantage.
Furthermore, Attorney King also investigates the actions and methods law enforcement officers utilize during investigation to determine if the officers:
If law enforcement claims the suspect voluntarily confessed to being involved in a homicide, Attorney King will thoroughly evaluate the content and circumstances of the purported confession to determine whether:
Another defense strategy might be an alibi defense, which an experienced attorney like Nellie L. King can help build. Alibi defenses involve the defendant affirmatively asserting that they were at another location during the time the offense occurred and therefore could not have been involved in the charged crime.
Attorney Nellie L. King has represented a range of clients who have been charged with manslaughter, murder, and even capital first degree murder where Florida sought the death penalty. As she strategized defenses for these cases, she also mounted serious investigations into law enforcement misconduct when law enforcement protocols and the Constitution have been unfairly used for the sake of arrest, and not necessarily a fair arrest.
Attorney King evaluates the evidence in each case thoroughly to assess the charges and evidence and therefore determine whether her client was improperly charged for a crime they did not commit. She insists that the government be held to their burden of proof, particularly when the offense involves the life, or potential death, of her client. She takes each case personally and creates both an aggressive and compassionate story for her client who is, after all, a human being with a right to defend their side of the story.